acceptance-orchestrator
Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.
Documentation
Acceptance Orchestrator
Overview
Orchestrate coding work as a state machine that ends only when acceptance criteria are verified with evidence or the task is explicitly escalated.
Core rule: do not optimize for "code changed"; optimize for "DoD proven".
When to Use
- The task already has an issue or clear acceptance criteria and should run end-to-end with minimal human re-intervention.
- You need structured handoff across implementation, review, deployment, and final verification.
- You want explicit stop conditions and escalation instead of silent partial completion.
Required Sub-Skills
create-issue-gateclosed-loop-deliveryverification-before-completion
Optional supporting skills:
deploy-devpr-watchpr-review-autopilotgit-ship
Inputs
Require these inputs:
- issue id or issue body
- issue status
- acceptance criteria (DoD)
- target environment (
devdefault)
Fixed defaults:
- max iteration rounds =
2 - PR review polling =
3m -> 6m -> 10m
State Machine
intakeissue-gatedexecutingreview-loopdeploy-verifyacceptedescalated
Workflow
-
Intake
- Read issue and extract task goal + DoD.
-
Issue gate
- Use
create-issue-gatelogic. - If issue is not
readyor execution gate is notallowed, stop immediately. - Do not implement anything while issue remains
draft.
- Use
-
Execute
- Hand off to
closed-loop-deliveryfor implementation and local verification.
- Hand off to
-
Review loop
- If PR feedback is relevant, batch polling windows as:
- wait
3m - then
6m - then
10m
- wait
- After the
10mround, stop waiting and process all visible comments together.
- If PR feedback is relevant, batch polling windows as:
-
Deploy and runtime verification
- If DoD depends on runtime behavior, deploy only to
devby default. - Verify with real logs/API/Lambda behavior, not assumptions.
- If DoD depends on runtime behavior, deploy only to
-
Completion gate
- Before any claim of completion, require
verification-before-completion. - No success claim without fresh evidence.
- Before any claim of completion, require
Stop Conditions
Move to accepted only when every acceptance criterion has matching evidence.
Move to escalated when any of these happen:
- DoD still fails after
2full rounds - missing secrets/permissions/external dependency blocks progress
- task needs production action or destructive operation approval
- review instructions conflict and cannot both be satisfied
Human Gates
Always stop for human confirmation on:
- prod/stage deploys beyond agreed scope
- destructive git/data operations
- billing or security posture changes
- missing user-provided acceptance criteria
Output Contract
When reporting status, always include:
Status: intake / executing / accepted / escalatedAcceptance Criteria: pass/fail checklistEvidence: commands, logs, API results, or runtime proofOpen Risks: anything still uncertainNeed Human Input: smallest next decision, if blocked
Do not report "done" unless status is accepted.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Use Cases
- The task already has an issue or clear acceptance criteria and should run end-to-end with minimal human re-intervention.
- You need structured handoff across implementation, review, deployment, and final verification.
- You want explicit stop conditions and escalation instead of silent partial completion.
Quick Info
- Source
- antigravity
- Category
- AI & Agents
- Repository
- View Repo
- Scraped At
- Mar 13, 2026
Tags
Related Skills
accessibility-compliance-accessibility-audit
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct audits, identify barriers, and provide remediation guidance.
accesslint-diff
Diff a live page's accessibility violations against a baseline — by default compares uncommitted changes (stash-based), or pass --branch [<name>] to diff against a branch. Reports only new violations introduced, violations fixed, and pre-existing count. Use `scan` for a full audit with no diffing.
accesslint-scan
Audit a live page for accessibility issues, locate each WCAG violation precisely, and return a selector-grounded fix worklist without editing.